Google-Tivo?

With Tivo prepared to offer searchable, downloadable advertising, I wonder if it enhances or detracts from a Google acquisition? In a previous post,
I thought a Tivo-Google marriage made sense because it would offer
Google an easy and relatively inexpensive way to establish a foothold
in the television market. Now, I'm not so sure. If Google is interested
in this market, there are other routes it can take other than spending
$500-million on Tivo. For example, it could sign deals with cablecos
such as Comcast, which appears to be a strong Google ally, to offer
AdSense/keyword advertising on a PVR device. Google could also strike
deals with a DVR makers to produce a low-cost product with Google
AdSense as a built-in feature. As Om Malik
points out in the latest issue of Business 2.0, Google M&A strategy
is focused on technology and people rather than full-fledged companies.
This pretty much eliminates Tivo as a takeover candidate – not even
taking into account the competition it's facing from cablecos,
satellite TV and, increasingly, telcos. A more likley scenario is
Google deals with a wide variety of service providers to create
revenue-sharing advertising opportunities in whiche content and
relevant-based advertising are seamlessly merged. So where does leave
Tivo? I suspect it will carry on with its
throw-spaghetti-at-the-wall-and-see-what-sticks strategy until
something works.

Skype's eBay-ization Continues

How long do you think Nikas Zennstrom and Janus Friis will be sticking around Skype? It probably won't be long given how Skype's management team is being eBay-ized. The newest Skype senior executive is Henry Gomez, who has been appointed general manager of Skype North America. Gomez had been eBay's senior vice-president of corporate communications and government relations. The other new Skype executives feverishly working to remove their eBay tatoos are former CFO Rajiv Dutta, who will become Skype's worldwide president after his replacement is hired, and Alex Kazim, formerly eBay's senior vice-president of new ventures, who will head up several new business areas for Skype. So now the senior management team is coming together, what's the new Skype strategy. There are about 4.1 billion reasons why I'm curious.
 

RIM Loves Halifax

Has Halifax becomes the hot, new high-tech centre in North America? The
city certainly has to be feeling pretty good after convincing Research
in Motion Ltd. to create 1,200 jobs there over the next five years.
These aren't low-paying call-centre jobs but “technical service”
positions where people handle problems that the carriers' customer reps
can't resolve. The Halifax facility will also take care of RIM's
top15,000 corporate customers. So why Halifax? Aside from C$19-million
government aid,  the province of Nova Scotia has a strong
post-secondary education system, lots of people who want to stay in the
province rather than “go away” to Ontario, and close proximity to the
Eastern Seaboard. I suspect Nova Scotia will also bend over backwards
to ensure RIM has everything it needs to start doing business without
any bureaucratic  hurdles. Still, it's a big coup for Halifax
given RIM must have been swamped with attractive offers from Canadian
and U.S. cities for the new facility. (RIM already operates similar
centres in Waterloo, Asia and Europe). It's also a major public
relations/goodwill coup for RIM, which scores huge points with
Canadians and the federal government.

Blogging for Fame and Fortune

So why do you blog? For fame? To have a creative and public outlet? To make the world a better place like my friend Tyler Hamilton? Vanity? Or, perhaps, for fortune? The New York Times
put the spotlight on the money yesterday with a story looking at how
advertising and market dollars – estimated at $50 million to $100
million a year according to Forrester Research's Charlene Li -
is flowing to blogs. Sure, there are individual bloggers making a
good living from advertising but those are few and far
between. But for most people, the only revenue flowing their way is an
occasional AdSense cheque from Google. I think most of the serious
money – if you can call $50 million to $100 million “serious” given it's a drop
in the advertising bucket – is being snapped up by blogging firms such as Weblogs Inc.
that can offer advertisers an easy way to reach a large number of
different consumers. This approach is opposed to the individual blogger
who, if
they have enough traffic and an advertising-friendly site, can be
tossed a bone across the transom
once in awhile. John Battelle's Federated Media appears
to be a sign of things to come because it provides bloggers with
the back-end infrastructure to do business (a.k.a. attract advertising)
while giving advertisers one point of contact to
access a semi-loose blog network. Federated Media's members include Boing Boing, 43 Folders and Om Malik's GigaOm.
From a financial standpoint, blogging is reaching an interesting stage
in its development. On one hand, the blogosphere is attracting millions
of readers and intriguing advertisers. But on the other, it is
still the Wild West where it can be challenging for readers and advertisers to find the cream of the
blog crop. Meanwhile, many really good bloggers
are having a tough time trying to get people to find them period. I
think blogging will move in many different directions. The creation of groups such as John Battelle's Federated Media will become more popular as entrepreneurs
looking to capitalize on a new opportunity. I think Big Media will also
get more serious about the business potential of blogging and there
will be more Weblogs Inc. created to pursue and court online advertising. As for the
little guy, I think some will thrive but it will be extremely difficult for
the vast majority to make anything substantial unless their sites are
extremely popular and reach a targeted audience. Like many bloggers,
I'm quasi-serious about the money. Every time I get a AdSense cheque,
it's like Christmas until I realize the Visa bill is much bigger.
I've also been playing around with AdGenta
ads for the past two months, which appear to get more “hits” than
AdSense. Would I like to make more money from advertisers? Sure, I'm a
red-blooded capitalist so if someone wants to a banner ad, drop me a
line. Has it happened yet? Nope. Do I care? I'm not terribly upset
about it. My blog continues to attract more traffic and, more,
important it has proven to be an interesting pipeline for new ideas and
opportunities. The bottom line is I enjoy it. I write for a living and
the blog is just another vehicle. What I find particularly exciting is
participating first-hand in a living, breathing technology trend -
something journalists don't get to do too much because we're observers
rather than players. By being part of “the game”, you get a much better
sense of what's actually happening so when the blogosphere takes off
(assuming it does), I'll hopefully have a front row seat on the action.
If you're one of those bloggers actually making a living writing a
blog, I'd be interested in your experience on how you got there.
Addendum: Hat tip to Matthew Ingram for a post about a NYT article earlier this week on where advertisers are putting some of their money online.
Ads by AdGenta.com
 
 

New Name But Look's the Same

You may have noticed the blog has had an evolving look and
feel over the past week as I've been tinkering with different templates
- Om Malik's recent redesign sparked this “project”. At the end of the
day, Blogware's templates were pretty limited so I ended up settling
for a new name: “Northern Telecom..and Tech” – a wink, wink, nudge,
nudge play, of course, on Nortel's old corporate moniker (shhh,
don't tell CEO Mike Zafirovski!) and the fact I live in the Great White
North. I've come to the sad conclusion I need to learn some basic HTML
so I can be a little creative. Any suggestions?
Ads by AdGenta.com
 
 

BusinessWeek's Bobbles Google Story

With Google breaking through $400 last week, BusinessWeek must have felt obligated to put the company on the cover this week. The thrust of the story is that with $120-billion market capitalization, Google has tremendous buying power and, as a result, it's changing the M&A, venture capital and start-up landscapes. What I found disappointing is the story's lack of depth. For example, it talks about how Google could easily make a mega-acquisition but then fails to identify potential targets that would be sense. (AOL, eBay, Knight-Ridder, etc?)  Tell me why Google should or should not buy AOL. Instead, the magazine rolls out the usual suspects such as Piper Jaffray analyst Safa Rashtchy who says “If they were to buy AOL or Ebay, it would hurt the stock”. That's fine but why would iit hurt the stock and what does it matter in the short-term if you're acquiring an attractive asset that can potentially provide you with long-term growth and strategic flexibility. Wouldn't investors applaud a move that would protect Google from losing the 12% of sales it now gets from AOL? To puncuate the story's shortcomings, it wraps up by talking about some ”glaring holes in [Google's] product lineup”. What are these mysterious holes (content? services? technology?) Why are they so glaring? Wat should Google do to address them/resolve them? Reading the BusinessWeek story felt a lot like having dinner and feeling hungry an hour later.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...