<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virgin Canada Drops Pre-Paid Prices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/09/29/virgin-canada-drops-pre-paid-prices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/09/29/virgin-canada-drops-pre-paid-prices/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/09/29/virgin-canada-drops-pre-paid-prices/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=967#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Useless product for anyone other than the teen set, it doesn&#39;t roam in the US and suprisingly it doesn&#39;t roam in the UK either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useless product for anyone other than the teen set, it doesn&#39;t roam in the US and suprisingly it doesn&#39;t roam in the UK either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: telco_guy</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/09/29/virgin-canada-drops-pre-paid-prices/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>telco_guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=967#comment-632</guid>
		<description>It spells desperation.  When cheeky advertising and being a champion of the little guy doesn&#39;t work, drop your pants on price.  
They want number portability faster, yet their business plan is predicated on first time phone users.  Why do first time phone users need number portability?  
Perhaps they need number portability faster because when someone leaves a pre-paid service provider, the paid balance stays with the old carrier.
Their business model is flawed.  They chose the wrong underlying carrier, and now, with no pricing power, they&#39;ll be done before number portability is implemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It spells desperation.  When cheeky advertising and being a champion of the little guy doesn&#39;t work, drop your pants on price.<br />
They want number portability faster, yet their business plan is predicated on first time phone users.  Why do first time phone users need number portability?<br />
Perhaps they need number portability faster because when someone leaves a pre-paid service provider, the paid balance stays with the old carrier.<br />
Their business model is flawed.  They chose the wrong underlying carrier, and now, with no pricing power, they&#39;ll be done before number portability is implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
