<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vonage: Raise a Lot, Spend a Lot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/05/29/vonage-raise-a-lot-spend-a-lot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/05/29/vonage-raise-a-lot-spend-a-lot/</link>
	<description>A Canadian Take on the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/05/29/vonage-raise-a-lot-spend-a-lot/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=603#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Mark,
You hit the nail on the head.  They are simply in a market share game to build a subscriber base to critical mass and then sell to highest bidder which I guess they figure will be one of the incumbent telcos who are getting into the voip market late.  I heard Vonage&#39;s customer acquisition costs are something like $1000 a head.  At $30 bucks a month that&#39;s almost 3 years before you move into the black.    So the $200M should get them another 200K subscribers.   I guess the question becomes what is critical mass in terms of a subscriber base?  What is also intriguing about this is if you look at a multiple of 3-5X revenue, the numbers are not that bad.  For example, if Vonage spends $200M to acquire 200K at $30/mo.  that equates to $72M a year in revenue.  At 5X revenue, those customers alone would be worth $360M or an 80% return on the $200M.  It would be interesting to know what % of the co. the PE investors got for $200M.
Don Rodriguez
don &#124; at &#124; cdpllc &#124; dot &#124; biz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
You hit the nail on the head.  They are simply in a market share game to build a subscriber base to critical mass and then sell to highest bidder which I guess they figure will be one of the incumbent telcos who are getting into the voip market late.  I heard Vonage&#39;s customer acquisition costs are something like $1000 a head.  At $30 bucks a month that&#39;s almost 3 years before you move into the black.    So the $200M should get them another 200K subscribers.   I guess the question becomes what is critical mass in terms of a subscriber base?  What is also intriguing about this is if you look at a multiple of 3-5X revenue, the numbers are not that bad.  For example, if Vonage spends $200M to acquire 200K at $30/mo.  that equates to $72M a year in revenue.  At 5X revenue, those customers alone would be worth $360M or an 80% return on the $200M.  It would be interesting to know what % of the co. the PE investors got for $200M.<br />
Don Rodriguez<br />
don | at | cdpllc | dot | biz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
