<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If not 8&#215;8, Then Who?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/01/29/if-not-8x8-then-who/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/01/29/if-not-8x8-then-who/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Startups, Entrepreneurs and the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:25:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: voip vendors</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/01/29/if-not-8x8-then-who/comment-page-1/#comment-169286</link>
		<dc:creator>voip vendors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=270#comment-169286</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;voip vendors...&lt;/strong&gt;

I never thought I will agree with this opinion, but you know... I agree partially now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>voip vendors&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I never thought I will agree with this opinion, but you know&#8230; I agree partially now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/01/29/if-not-8x8-then-who/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 05:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=270#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Packet8 is the best rated service around.  It had a former life which makes it tough balance sheetwise  but it will be a winner in the end.
I tried Vonage.  It sucks by comparison.
http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/packet8-videophone-review.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Packet8 is the best rated service around.  It had a former life which makes it tough balance sheetwise  but it will be a winner in the end.<br />
I tried Vonage.  It sucks by comparison.<br />
<a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/packet8-videophone-review.asp" rel="nofollow">http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/packet8-videophone-review.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/01/29/if-not-8x8-then-who/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=270#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Have service provider stocks ever done really well over the long run?  incumbents not included, especially not canadian ones...
I think investors would be better served looking at infrastructure enablers... and maybe enterprise plays....
Perhaps an AUDC, INTL,  or maybe chip heavyweights like TI, BRCM who have embraced VoIP early on as part of their growth strategies... Or access network vendors who benefit from VoIP demand... ARRS, TERN...
Or you go with CSCO/AVaya...
8x8 is one of the weakest ideas out there... although perhaps at times a great &quot;trading idea&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have service provider stocks ever done really well over the long run?  incumbents not included, especially not canadian ones&#8230;<br />
I think investors would be better served looking at infrastructure enablers&#8230; and maybe enterprise plays&#8230;.<br />
Perhaps an AUDC, INTL,  or maybe chip heavyweights like TI, BRCM who have embraced VoIP early on as part of their growth strategies&#8230; Or access network vendors who benefit from VoIP demand&#8230; ARRS, TERN&#8230;<br />
Or you go with CSCO/AVaya&#8230;<br />
8&#215;8 is one of the weakest ideas out there&#8230; although perhaps at times a great &#8220;trading idea&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/01/29/if-not-8x8-then-who/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 22:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=270#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Now 8x8 goes back to the well for another $14M and 7M shares. Do you feel the dilution now? That balance sheet must be weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now 8&#215;8 goes back to the well for another $14M and 7M shares. Do you feel the dilution now? That balance sheet must be weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2005/01/29/if-not-8x8-then-who/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=270#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Well, since we have the CRTC holding Bell&#039;s arms behind its back, allowing the independent VoIP providers and cablecos to punch them in the gut repeatedly, seems that the play *may* be shorting the telcos and going long cable stocks.  Just an idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since we have the CRTC holding Bell&#39;s arms behind its back, allowing the independent VoIP providers and cablecos to punch them in the gut repeatedly, seems that the play *may* be shorting the telcos and going long cable stocks.  Just an idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

