<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIM: Back in Black(berry)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2004/04/08/rim-back-in-blackberry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2004/04/08/rim-back-in-blackberry/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2004/04/08/rim-back-in-blackberry/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2004 00:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=36#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Take a look at Nokia form factors over time, and compare them to the Balckberry. RIM has changed little, Nokia is in a constant state of evolution. Nokia seems to &#39;get&#39; what people want and need. I suspect it won&#39;t be too long before a functional enterprise version of the N-Gage (not that this was successful) is introduced byb Nokia. They also have a partnership in place with RIM, so BB functionality is possible....
Mark Q (Yankee)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at Nokia form factors over time, and compare them to the Balckberry. RIM has changed little, Nokia is in a constant state of evolution. Nokia seems to &#39;get&#39; what people want and need. I suspect it won&#39;t be too long before a functional enterprise version of the N-Gage (not that this was successful) is introduced byb Nokia. They also have a partnership in place with RIM, so BB functionality is possible&#8230;.<br />
Mark Q (Yankee)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
